it will not be too pretty with such a large sub-index to the sum.
>
> There is also
>
> \sum_{\startsubstack \NC a \NR \NC b \NR \stopsubstack}
>
> which imitates the \substack command from latex.
>
> OT but it is better to use on
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can try something like
>
> \sum_{\mstack{k=0, k\equiv p + 1 (\mtext{mod }2)}}^{p -1}
>
> but it will not be too pretty with such a large sub-index to the sum.
There is also
\sum_{\startsubstack \NC a \NR \N
gt;\NC x > 2 \NR
> > \stopalign}}=+\infty
> > \stopformula
> > \stoptext
>
> \starttext
>
> \startformula
>\lim_{%
> \startsubstack
>x \to 2 \NR
>x > 2 \NR
> \stopsubstack
>} = +\infty
> \stopformula
>
ign}}=+\infty
\stopformula
\stoptext
\starttext
\startformula
\lim_{%
\startsubstack
x \to 2 \NR
x > 2 \NR
\stopsubstack
} = +\infty
\stopformula
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___
If your qu
> > https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089790.html
> > Unfortunately it seems like you broke substack and mathmatrix on the way.
> > MWE below fails
> > with version 2017.09.08 17:24
> >
> > Cheers, Henri
> >
> > ---
> >
&g
---
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\sum_{\startsubstack
\NC k \NR
\NC \omega_n \NR
\stopsubstack}
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathmatrix[left=\left|,right=\right|]
\NC 0 \NC 1 \NR
\NC 1 \NC 0 \NR
\stopmathmatrix
= -1 .
\stopformula
\stoptext
\sum_{\startsubstack
\NC k \NR
\NC \omega_n \NR
\stopsubstack}
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathmatrix[left=\left|,right=\right|]
\NC 0 \NC 1 \NR
\NC 1 \NC 0 \NR
\stopmathmatrix
= -1 .
\stopformula
\stoptext
Hi,
In the following minimal example
\startformula
P = \left(\vphantom{\sum}\smash{\sum_{\startsubstack
1 \le i \le p \NR
1 \le j \le q \NR
1 \le k \le r \NR
\stopsubstack}}
a_{ij}b_{jk}c_{ki}
\right)
\stopformula
\smash does not work properly in mkiv – in mkii it runs just fine!
Best regards
See http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf
oops, should have tried that first.
\startsubstack line 1 \NR line 2 \stopsubstack
thanks for pointing me to the solution!
tobias
___
If your question
$T$|-|stage sequential decomposition
of~\in[eq:DP] can be combined into a one|-|step $T$|-|stage sequential
decomposition
\placeformula[eq:one step] \startformula \startalign
\NC
\1 V_t(\1 {Ï}_t) =
\smash{\inf_{ \docramped\scriptstyle{\startsubstack
\NC g^1_t \in \FSPACE G
\stopsubstack}
The subscript did go below the integral, but the two integral symbols are
separate from each other. Any tips? Thanks a lot!
$$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\startsubstack x \ge 0,\NR 0 \le y \le \stopsubstack}
$$
(it should be possible to do this more elegant, though)
\iint\limits
the integral, but the two integral symbols are
separate from each other. Any tips? Thanks a lot!
$$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\startsubstack x \ge 0,\NR 0 \le y \le \stopsubstack}
$$
(it should be possible to do this more elegant, though
\stopsubstack}
The subscript did go below the integral, but the two integral symbols are
separate from each other. Any tips? Thanks a lot!
$$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\startsubstack x \ge 0,\NR 0 \le y \le \stopsubstack}
$$
(it should be possible to do this more elegant, though)
\iint\limits should
* Textools now helps create module packages
* Colors can inherit from palette colors
* Support for buffer nesting
* Modules can now be loaded with arguments
* New math environments: \startintertext and \startsubstack
* Linenumbering improved/extended
* Marginfloat placement improvements
On 4/25/06, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* New math environments: \startintertext and \startsubstack
Is ConTeXt coming closer to what LaTeX and Nath has in way of math
support? I.e., are we more or less incorporating the nice stuff from
the two into ConTeXt now?
nikolai
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/25/06, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* New math environments: \startintertext and \startsubstack
Is ConTeXt coming closer to what LaTeX and Nath has in way of math
support? I.e., are we more or less incorporating the nice stuff from
the two
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/25/06, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* New math environments: \startintertext and \startsubstack
Is ConTeXt coming closer to what LaTeX and Nath has in way of math
support? I.e., are we more or less incorporating the nice stuff from
in typing environments
* a fix for delimitedtext (Gerben's quotation bug)
* \startsubstack ... stopsubstack added
* the change for equation label behvaiour. If you want
to test it, change the \NC's in Hans' example to \NR's.
(a bare \startformula ... \NR[eq4] \stopformula doesnt
work, but I am
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
* In core-reg.tex, \doflushatpar has gone in favour of \dogotpar,
but \complexdoseeregister and \dodolinkedregister still use it.
done
* \startsubstack ... stopsubstack still uses the \vadjust I wrote,
not Hans' improved version
done
* The bibliography
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Does this look ok?
(code is not production-ready yet, but seems reasonable to me)
Taco
\def\startsubstack
{\begingroup
\null
\vcenter\bgroup
\pushmacro\domatrixNC
\let\endmath\relax
\def\NC{\domatrixNC}%
\def\MC{\domatrixNC\ifmmode\else
Does this look ok?
(code is not production-ready yet, but seems reasonable to me)
Taco
\def\startsubstack
{\begingroup
\null
\vcenter\bgroup
\pushmacro\domatrixNC
\let\endmath\relax
\def\NC{\domatrixNC}%
\def\MC{\domatrixNC\ifmmode\else$\def\endmath{$}\fi
21 matches
Mail list logo
